Awaiting reviewer selection sample. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9.

Awaiting reviewer selection sample Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. This ensures that we receive as wide a mix of views on the manuscript as possible. Follow answered Apr 1, 2015 at 8:59. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). This is a Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Add a 4. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. Do not email to ask about AE stands for Associate Editor. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. t backed up) The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Improve this I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). What does this mean? Will it go for review? Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. I have submitted a perspective article. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. ). I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow For example, the editor or the editor's assistant might have reset the number of Maybe. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Aguinis et al. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. I have previously published in the same journal Differential behaviour of author and editor suggested reviewers T horax is now the second highest ranked respiratory journal and submissions are increasing year on year. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. This may, however, vary across journals. 21, awaiting AE decision. As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. آیا مقاله من برای داوری رد شده است؟ اکنون، پس از امتیازات داور و پس از انتظار، وضعیت “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” و “Awaiting Final Decision “را با هم نشان می دهد I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. However, on the same day, the Thank you for your question. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. If corrections of minor errors such as undersized captions, font size, and misspellings would make the paper of longer-term value, it should be accepted after the corrections. 2. As 3 months have past after re-submission, and the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” for more than 1 month, I am going to send an inquiry to the journal. OR. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Wait! It is not late yet. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. Review and selection of manuscripts. What does it mean if the status date changes while the status remains with editor? Question. , 2020) addresses this void and aims to identify the dominant approaches to sample selection and provide insights into essential choices in this step of AE stands for "Associate Editor. 06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. ' However, I'm Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation the consistency of its scientific methodology and the sample used; as well as its relevance and whether it’s bibliography is up to date. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. e. بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. The rest of the lines were already covered in the other post, like the strange double entry of “Decision Made. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. 19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments 10. This may involve checking that the submission is within the journal's scope and adheres to submission guidelines. The statute of De Nederlandsche Bank is currently being amended. " My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Then I revised and resubmitted. ; The Statute of Uses three centuries after the Statutes of Mortmain would attempt, with only partial success to end the practice of cestui que use. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. 9. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Role of the journal editor. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision Selecting and Inviting Reviewers 1. Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and In general, Sage strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. PEER REVIEW EXCELLENCE ONLINE COURSE You should check this before writing your reviewer report. In this step, the scientific editor decides whether the article should be rejected or should The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. Thank you. Review Settings . Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. However, I definitely remember the last two: The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. user32537 user32537. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but I made all necessary changes recommended by reviewers and resubmitted the paper about 12 days ago. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. You can register for free here: Peer Review Excellence. 24 Awaiting I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. If a paper satisfies all the above criteria, it should be accepted. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. 23 Resubmitted 10. It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. By contrast, the matching-based approach is Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. comment on how well the authors addressed the concerns of the other previous reviewers as well, or if you agree or disagree with the feedback from the other reviewers (based on the response to reviewers provided by the authors). The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. Does anyone have any idea why Abstract. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Our entire research enterprise would stop functioning without Reviewers. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. Awaiting reviewer scores Reviewers are working on their reviews. Add a comment | -1 . If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. It has been noted that selection processes sometimes fail to check prospective employee references and background checks. 6. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. The reviewer has accepted the invitation However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. I didnt see the "under review "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. While we typically The statute of “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” lasted for more than one year. ai's Referee Finder, Global Campus AI, and Dimensions. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for conce • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. When the It is important to acknowledge that several organizations are already addressing some of the limitations identified in this study through specialized AI-powered reviewer selection tools. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is Editor here. What stage normally follows the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I've reviewed papers for journals, but this is the first paper I've submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Examples include Prophy. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. But today I noticed that the status changed again and it says 'Awaiting Reviewer Agreement'. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. For most manuscripts, in the The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers by appropriate control groups. 1. Okay, it has been sent for review again. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. For example, if the submission only has • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 5 "Awaiting AE I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. For example, reviewer #2 in To get a second opinion, they have referred the manuscript both to the ME and to the peer reviewers. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Reviewer status and be badged as a training graduate on our reviewer selection system, making it more likely that you will be selected to review. Not sure if the previous reviewer rejected it or had conflicting opinions, need to include a The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. Generally, the retrieval-based approach is usually applied in the one-to-several reviewer assignment scenarios, i. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: If all the reviewers from the last round are invited, they should be kept in the same order. Failing to take up references. One or more may have pulled out from the review due to issues over availability, a mismatch with their subject area, or a conflict of interest. Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor is searching for viable peer Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, whether you want to prepare offline or Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. Awaiting reviewers scores simply mean the article is with the reviewers and the journal office is waiting for the Does the status 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' mean that the manuscript has passed desk rejection by the editor? A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. ” A second example table I’ll show you is one where the paper was eventually . Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. Locate the manuscript using the Quick Search or “Manuscripts Awaiting Revision” queue. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded Editorial Manager (EM) offers several different search options and tools for locating and selecting reviewers. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. If so, the associate editor (AE) now needs to look for peer reviewers again. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Click the blue “Take Action The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. 1 To attract high quality manuscripts, authors must have confidence in our editorial process and we are committed to continuing and improving the transparency, efficiency, and fairness of peer review. So, on average, you and your co-authors should collectively provide a similar number of reviews. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". patience is key Guest. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Can you please explain what it is going on? It looks like the editor wanted another opinion about the paper, and the next morning new potential reviewers were selected and emails were sent off. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. – Jon Custer. 09 Awaiting AE Decision 10. 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. It status changed very quickly from 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' to 'Awaiting Reviewer Scores'. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for an existing reviewer in the system or to create a new reviewer account. The status of the paper changed several times. Follow this Question. But the whole selection process needs to have a sense of experience and not just simply overlooking it. Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, to go to the ‘reviewer’ page for the selected submission Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). I for example look at my assignments once a week. Hi. ai's Reviewer Finder. The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. View. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, reviewer has agreed to review, maybe even reviewer has submitted a review but there're other reviewers who have not yet completed their reviews. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Answer. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Dec 3, 2015 9:59:30 GMT -5 . Does it mean the work will The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build a detailed point-by Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Share. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. Several of our journals also employ a panel of reviewers who have agreed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. This chapter reviews the journal submission and review process, starting with navigating manuscript submission sites and proceeding through editorial review, peer review, editorial decisions, revising and resubmitting manuscripts, developing reviewer response letters, finalizing manuscripts, and correcting publisher proofs. There is no set time for this to take. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews Submission System says „awaiting reviewer selection“ since I submitted 3 months ago. The journal told me ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other Peer reviewers selected by keywords* Desk Reject Checked for compliance with journal guidelines *Tip: make sure the keywords in For example, are the keywords broad enough to lure in readers with a broad interest in the topic but narrow enough to accurately reflect the For example, if there are going to be 10 chapters in a 350-page book the average chapter length will be 35 pages. ; His most important contribution to the statute book is The Statute of Frauds. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. , selecting several reviewers from the candidate reviewers database for one paper at each time, a common example is the reviewer assignment process of papers submitted to the journals. I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. I wrote the editorial assistant, he answered paper is under review, but doesn’t know when decision will take The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. " Your manuscript was sent for peer review, but not all the reviewers got back with the review. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". When you review a paper you read a manuscript critically, and start to realize potential criticisms reviewers might have of your future papers. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). 26, awaiting reviewer scores. The editor then selects individual candidates to be added to the submission as Invited, Assigned, Alternate, or Proposed. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations A mentor's voice for younger or inexperienced candidates is a prime example of this. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation Reviewers are urged to seriously consider the criteria outlined above when reviewing a paper. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. The ‘-7’ indicated Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. What does it mean? It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Reviewers are not always accurate with their comments and sometimes editors intervene, for example, to seek another opinion. 19 Awaiting AE Decision 10. log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Once the search has been run, the results appear as a candidate list. 18 Submit 9. Some editorial systems give the Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. If, for example, claims are made about cross-linguistic influence from a particular language X Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Click on “Take Action. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. However, I just noticed that the status of my Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. " This status has not been changed for a month. Improve this answer. Commented Oct 18, 2023 at 12:39. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. Thirty-five articles (25 studies) met inclusion criteria; two rated moderate in quality; 12 described cohort designs; 17 described interventions in remote/very remote communities; none focused on urban communities; and 11 reported moderate or strong Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. 15-6. Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. You are not required to grant their request. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Asked by Hend Okasha on 01 May, 2021 . online-publication; Share. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, reviewers are selected on an ad hoc basis and may have no connection with either the journal or the Society. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. You may learn more through this similar related query: What does the journal status "Awaiting reviewer reply" mean? The present methodological literature review (cf. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. However, a chapter prepared in Word will be longer than on the final printed page. ceya wbmqyuca zokbk rredn zvmhtjc qimbj jotbpz ngqnh ykgzt pnldo