Awaiting reviewer selection after major revision sample. Awaiting Editor Decision.

Awaiting reviewer selection after major revision sample 18 Submit for review after major revision 2. Review Settings . The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. 11 Accepted The changes in the submission status can be referred to by everyone. Now I want to submit my manuscript to another journal, but it would be a duplicate submission in this situation. Major revisions It is very unusual for a paper to be accepted without needing any revisions. So, please give me Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. 06. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Submitted on October 27th last year, it has been revised twice. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: Revisions Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 20, and 40 days, respectively, to resubmit the revised manuscript. tral examples of each recommendation are provided in the screenshots below): 1) Publish As Is. In this situation, if all requested changes are made, a minor Is it normal to have the status "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" pop up a day or two after submitting a minor revision? My understanding was that once a minor revision was submitted the paper would not go out for further peer-review? This is a journal using the ScholarOne system. Does this After selecting The TQM Journal, I read carefully the instructions that are provided by the journal itself. 5 resubmitted 11. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. procession - Awaiting administrative processing Journal scope and submission types. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should be redone and re-reviewed. Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. 1. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Usually, the journal's guidelines should state what has to be done for the major revision and how to report on it. (To be sure, the kinds of minor revisions I've suggested may also be necessary as part of a broader slate of major revisions for an article. 2022 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 18. 7-14 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 8-3 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment One reviewer accepted the paper after major revisions, while another claimed lack of innovation and rejected it. The status of the paper changed several times. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. In the absense of such 2. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". The Editor will take into I have submitted a manuscript to a pediatrics-related journal. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). The author’s claims are not Reviewer Guidelines the magazine for high-tech The reviewers' and editors' comments provide guideposts as to why a paper receives a “major” versus “minor” revision decision. After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. Hoping for good news and praying for a speedy acceptance! I have successfully revised a paper with a reject from one reviewer, through a major revision, into an accepted article. 11. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. Very responsible. 2 reviewers were happy with the revisions, one reviewed the revisions, and we had to do more. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. ) Keep in mind that neither a major nor a minor revision are approving the paper as is. After the second revision, one reviewer accepted it, one reviewer made minor revisions, and one reviewer made major revisions. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. Once you have found potential reviewers using the selection tips provided in this document, you will need to verify them by taking the following steps: I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023-7-18 awaiting final decision 2023-7-31 major revision 2023-8-12 revision submitted 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. 18 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. Additionally, after the revised manuscript is returned, each author will receive an email requesting supplementary One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). Also, the statuses appeared very shortly after submission so I would be surprised if the reviewers had time to read and comment so fast. If a manuscript does not have enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. Your article After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer like what @Eppicurt said, it's hard to tell without knowing the details, but if after the first round of review, the verdict is "minor revision", and you've done what the reviewers suggested, then I would say it has a good chance of being accepted (this is from my own experience both as author and reviewer, but NOT in biology field), worst case you probably A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. What can this mean? The platform is For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. Where possible, this will be done by the original reviewers to check whether their comments have been addressed, however, if they are not available, other Reviewing a Revised Article If you’re reviewing a revised version of an article you’ve reviewed before, you should evaluate the updated article, any supplementary information, and the authors’ response to reviewers to determine if all your concerns have been addressed and if you are satisfied with the updates. Before reviewing for Proceedings A, please familiarise yourself with the scope of the journal. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. I made all the required amendments and submit again. There is Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. Reviewer feedback At IOP Publishing, we have implemented a system to offer reviewers feedback on their reports. * When major revision was required (ie increasing sample size for a clinical study),and because it wasn't impossible to do in the time allowed for answering (one month), and as I had sufficiently B. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. I feel lucky this time to have encountered good editors and reviewers. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? See best practice guidance for the following: Reviewer verification Review content; Reviewing a paper yourself ; Peer reviews by early career researchers Recommended reviewers Reviewer verification. 14 submitted 9. are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? [email protected] Submitted my paper. This change has occurred I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. " Does it mean that my paper will go through The status is shown as “awaiting reviewer selection” apparently because the editor is still waiting for reviewers to accept the invitation to review. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. For some journals, including JGME, major versus minor is not determined by the number of comments, but by the journal's commitment to publish. In the case Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Minor Revision. Choose 'Editor Center' and then click on 'Awaiting Referee Selection' C. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. It was sent back for further revisions on May 29th. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". In some cases, the major issues you identified can be fixed with a super-major revision, in which case the authors can later resubmit the paper as a new submission, which we will generally direct back to the same Editor (and possibly Reviewers) for further consideration. . This change has occurred Once you have resubmitted your paper, it will once again be reviewed. The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. My first round of review went well, with one reviewer only suggesting stylistic improvements Reviewers, in fact, can recommend one of five decisions: a) publish as is, b) minor revision and publish, c) minor revision and re-review, d) major revision and re-review, and e) reject. As 3 months have past after re-submission, and the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” for more than 1 month, I am going to send an inquiry to the journal. 28 major revision 11. This change has occurred Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Hot Network Questions Why does the United Kingdom's handgun ban not apply to Northern Ireland? You haven’t mentioned how many reviewers accepted the peer review the first time. Review and selection of manuscripts. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. This change has occurred I contacted the journal several times, but there was no reply. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the manuscript to another journal”. Many small grammar mistakes and details in the figures were pointed out. Does it mean the work will be I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. Was your notation non-standard, for example? 2023. My manuscript had earlier gone through English proofreading by a professional vendor. Your manuscript has cleared desk screening If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. g. It status changed very quickly from 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' to 'Awaiting Reviewer Scores'. Improve this answer. (monocrystal sample) white or transparent? If the recommendation for your initial submission was minor or major revision and you have carefully addressed all reviewer comments, there is a good chance that your manuscript will finally be What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 4. For example, minor revisions would not entail conducting a bunch of new analyses or overhauling part of the manuscript. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. Most important, however is to try to address the reasons why you weren't understood. For minor revisions, some editors might make a decision on their A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. I got 'Major corrections' from two reviewers, however, Editor decided that I have to 'revise and resubmit'. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my Skip to main content. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. The Editor will take into Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Pub-Express I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. This change has occurred like what @Eppicurt said, it's hard to tell without knowing the details, but if after the first round of review, the verdict is "minor revision", and you've done what the reviewers suggested, then I would say it has a good chance of being accepted (this is from my own experience both as author and reviewer, but NOT in biology field), worst case you probably Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. This change has occurred For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. Share. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. 12. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". You haven’t also mentioned whether it was a major revision or a minor revision. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. Then I revised and resubmitted. " Since the status remained "reviewer assigned," we sent a mail with requesting clarification. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. Upon receipt of the two reviewers’ reports, the Editor makes the first decision of the following: Accept without further modification; Accept after minor revision; Accept after major revision; Reject; If the decision is to request revision of the manuscript, authors have 2 weeks to resubmit their revised manuscript. What could be In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. This Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. What factors delay a final decision in the editorial process. 2022 Awaiting final decision Major Revision (acceptance after one major revision and one minor revision, editor status as major revision) 9. A paper classified as major revision is I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. The journal considers a range of paper types, including new research, reviews, perspectives, evidence synthesis, and “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. 14 AE reviewing, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022. The article fulfills all of the requirements listed above and is ready for publication. It took 12 months & we had to hit their deadlines bc we were under scoop protection. Based on the information you have provided though, it was probably a major revision. You want to make the referee's and editor's job as easy as possible. The submission is now with the author. This means that the submission needs extensive work and will need to be sent back to the I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers. It covers tools and methodologies, languages, data structures, and algorithms. 18 Submit 9. You may also wish to “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. The Editor will determine if additional input is needed from reviewers. I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Good Luck! 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but finally everything is settled before graduation! It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. I submitted a manuscript to a SAGE journal through ScholarOne 4 months ago. Skip to main content. However, today, After 5 months I received a "Major revision". In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Copy the reviewer comments and answer each and every of them while also helpfully pointing out related changes to the manuscript. I was wondering about the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I wa • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Awaiting Editor Decision. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. In most cases, the revised manuscript will be re-assigned to the original Editor. It is just guessing. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. During reject and resubmit, I got The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. (3) Reconsider (re-review) after major revision: At least one reviewer recommends “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision”, and no “Reject” is recommended. Bottom line, it's all depends how well you respond to reviewer comments and how much reviewer and editor get satisfy with your revised version. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all aspects of that challenge: specification, design, development and maintenance. It is definitely possible. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. " 9. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. At this In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually My paper underwent a revision. " This status has not been changed for a month. Can I send a email to AE? The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. For example entering ‘rev*’ into the ‘quick search’ box will show you all reviewers whose first or last name Make a decision of ‘Minor Revision’, ‘Moderate Revision’ or ‘Major Revision’. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Add a What does it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 10 Awaiting reviewer scores 11. Even then, resubmission after rejection may be impossible. 4. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. 2022 In peer review process 23. Click in the 'Take Action' column to view the submission or assign reviewers. 8. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. user32537 user32537. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Is this I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. However, for Scientific Reports, it’s typically two or three. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Proceedings A publishes articles across the chemical, computational, Earth, engineering, mathematical, and physical sciences. " Does this I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. If you recommend acceptance, provide detail justifying rated reviews, you will be more likely to be selected to review again. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. One reviewer suggested to accepts it as is, the second didn't give a response. In this case, the revised manuscript must be sent to the reviewers for reassessment. submissions that you expect to accept after one revision. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. If the evaluations require major revisions and the paper has been submitted as I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. 9. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. 08 Awaiting reviewer scores 10. Maybe the reviewer(s) had some spare time, maybe a glance at the paper was enough (although that would be odd, as an editor would normally decide a straight reject if this is what the paper calls for) What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. Once enough reviewers have been selected, If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. The day after the submission though, the two statuses of ‘Awaiting It means that the paper is just not up to the quality we require for TWC. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 22 Accepted This editor works really fast, and the reviewer's comments are very detailed. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. TOSEM also reports on We have written a revised manuscript since the original version is received a decision of "major revision. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Follow answered Apr 1, 2015 at 8:59. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced I just had a paper accepted after 2 rounds of revisions. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. Hi. These types of revisions include adding new sections, providing more examples to illustrate the points made, or significant rewriting to improve the clarity, flow, or quality of Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. 2 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 少林淫僧 2023-07-30 May I ask, after AWPL rejects and resubmits, will the reviewer remain the same? In the past, the journals I submitted to required major revisions, so I am unsure if I should include a revision report for this rejection and resubmission format. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. Once the adequate number of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 2) Major Revision. You I have an experience of getting two minor revisions and finally article was rejected, othe other hand another article was accepted after major revision. This change has occurred 2022. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. A few months ago, I submitted my paper. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 05. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". I wa 17. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. 24 Major revision (3 reviewers, 18 comments) Smile执着 2023-01-18 Hello, may I ask how much is Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. A major revision was submitted to a journal. How Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. 21 Awaiting reviewer assignment 10. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. comments and decide the next steps for the After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. This change has occurred I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. The suggestions made for the paper did not improve it even a I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. r/AskAcademia A chip A Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. In this article, we have grouped b, c, and d together under the heading ‘reviewers’ manuscript (major) revision’. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. 13 Awaiting admin. 10 AE reviewing, Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Thank you for your assistance. We did everything they asked. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Reconsider after major revision, appropriate to select if you believe that significant revisions to the manuscript are necessary before it could be reconsidered. 15 Review comments returned, major revision 2. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. 5. I want to know how long will this status last. You will now see a list of your assignments. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Dears I submitted a paper, after 4 months I received major revisions from 2 reviewers. I made all necessary changes recommended by reviewers and resubmitted the paper about 12 days ago. This change has occurred Hi. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment After double checking the Response to reviewers at major revision stage, we still believe that we have addressed reviewer#2 comments adequately (at least straightforward comments like putting the No, it is very unlikely to succeed unless you do major modifications, addressing the concerns of the reviewer(s). there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. The editor sent the manuscript to a third reviewer who suggested rejection with very negative comments in everything. and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. There were three reviewers. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. But there is still no response. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. I revised and resubmitted. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. I would write your best revision and include a very strongly (but politely and professionally) constructed and worded cover letter directly addressing the reviewer's points including the fact that Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. The article has significant deficiencies in content and grammar. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? The paper is a 'revise and resubmit' (major revision) so I think it would only go back to the reviewers that already read it (max 3). reviewer selection. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision after a long time). qvva bdnpet imbrl jza vciokv mxcm hxcvcv tdhaju zey zvgne